Introduction:
The development of Arabic language and literature in India is part of a long and rich intellectual tradition. Arabic was not used in India merely as a language of religious education; it also developed as an important medium of scholarship, philosophy, historiography, literature, poetry, and cultural communication. The writings of Indian scholars and literary figures reflect both the influence of the classical Arabic literary tradition and the social, cultural, and historical realities of Indian society. Particularly in the context of the political and social transformations of the nineteenth century, Indian Arabic literature acquired a distinct historical significance. It is within this broader context that the literary legacy of Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi needs to be considered. He is generally evaluated in terms of his theological and philosophical scholarship and his association with the historical events of 1857. However, his identity and contribution as an Arabic literary figure have received comparatively less attention. In particular, comparatively limited attention has been given to the relationship between his Arabic literary expression and his anti-colonial intellectual consciousness within the broader context of nineteenth-century Indian Arabic literature.1 His writings can be examined for their engagement with classical Arabic literary forms and rhetorical traditions, as well as for their expression of contemporary social, moral, and historical consciousness. The relationship between his literary expression and the political realities of the colonial period, resistance, religious consciousness, and personal experience provides an important literary-historical perspective from which to approach his works.
The primary objective of this chapter is to evaluate Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi’s Arabic literary legacy within the historical and intellectual context of his time. It examines his literary identity, selected works, their major themes and characteristics, and the relationship between his intellectual position and the realities of colonial India. Such an approach makes it possible to view Khairabadi not only as a scholar associated with the political events of his time but also as an important figure in the development of Arabic literary culture in India. The chapter therefore seeks to highlight his distinctive place in Indian Arabic literary history and to illuminate the relationship between literature, culture, historical experience, and anti-colonial consciousness.
Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi: Intellectual Formation: Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi (1797–1861) emerged from the rich scholarly environment of nineteenth-century North India, where Arabic remained an important language of Islamic scholarship, philosophy, theology, jurisprudence, and literary expression. Born in Khairabad in present-day Uttar Pradesh, he belonged to a distinguished family of learning and received an extensive education in both the transmitted and rational sciences. His intellectual formation was shaped not only by traditional Islamic disciplines but also by the study of logic, philosophy, theology, and Arabic literary culture. This broad intellectual training played an important role in the formation of his identity as a scholar and writer. His intellectual profile, therefore, cannot be confined to a single field, since his writings reveal the interaction of religious thought, philosophical reasoning, literary expression, and the historical circumstances of nineteenth-century India. The intellectual culture in which he was educated had inherited a long tradition of engagement with classical Arabic sources, and this tradition provided Indian scholars with the linguistic and conceptual resources required for sophisticated theological and philosophical discussion. Khairabadi’s intellectual formation should consequently be understood not merely as the acquisition of religious knowledge but as participation in a wider scholarly culture in which Arabic functioned as an important medium of intellectual communication.
Khairabadi’s scholarly significance is particularly evident in his Arabic prose. His theological and philosophical writings demonstrate a command of the argumentative and rhetorical traditions of classical Arabic scholarship. Works such as Taḥqīq al-Fatwah fī Ibṭāl al-Taghwā reflect his engagement with theological controversy and his ability to construct sustained arguments in Arabic.2 His prose indicates an intellectual method in which established authorities, rational argument, conceptual distinctions, and rhetorical presentation work together to establish a position. Such writing is significant for the study of Arabic literature in India because it demonstrates that Arabic was not simply a language used for reproducing inherited texts. It was also an active intellectual medium through which Indian scholars interpreted existing traditions, responded to debates, defended particular positions, and participated in the continuing development of Islamic thought. Khairabadi’s writings thus belong simultaneously to the history of Islamic scholarship and to the history of Arabic literary expression in South Asia. His Arabic literary identity should therefore be considered within the wider intellectual history of Indo-Arabic scholarship, where linguistic competence and literary skill were closely connected with theological, philosophical, and intellectual activity.
Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi: Arabic Literary Figure: Although Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi is frequently remembered for his theological scholarship and his association with the events of 1857, his literary personality deserves independent consideration. He wrote in Arabic and participated in the literary culture of his period, and Arabic poetry forms an important part of the corpus associated with his name. His literary expression reflects familiarity with the classical Arabic tradition in diction, rhetorical construction, poetic imagery, and thematic development.3 At the same time, his writings were produced within the particular cultural and historical environment of India. This combination of classical literary inheritance and Indian historical experience gives his Arabic writings a distinctive position within the history of Arabic literature in India. His literary personality therefore cannot be adequately understood by examining his political activities or theological scholarship alone. His use of Arabic demonstrates his ability to move between intellectual argument and literary expression and to employ the resources of an established literary tradition in response to the circumstances of his own time.
His Arabic literary production also illustrates the continuity of the classical Arabic tradition beyond the Arab world. The use of established literary forms did not prevent Indian scholars from expressing local experiences and contemporary concerns. Rather, the classical tradition provided a flexible intellectual and aesthetic framework through which new experiences could be articulated. In Khairabadi’s case, Arabic became a medium through which intellectual argument, religious conviction, historical memory, personal experience, and literary emotion could be brought together. His literary importance, therefore, lies not merely in the fact that he wrote Arabic, but in the manner in which the inherited Arabic literary tradition was employed to articulate the intellectual and historical concerns of an Indian Muslim scholar of the nineteenth century. His writings demonstrate that Arabic literary culture in India was neither detached from Indian society nor confined to the repetition of classical models. Instead, classical forms could acquire new significance when employed to interpret changing historical realities.
Arabic Prose and Intellectual Expression: One of the most important dimensions of Khairabadi’s Arabic legacy is his prose writing. His theological and philosophical works demonstrate an argumentative style rooted in the classical scholarly tradition. His prose is characterised by logical organisation, conceptual precision, extensive engagement with earlier authorities, and a rhetorical style appropriate to theological and intellectual debate. These characteristics reveal an important relationship between literary form and intellectual purpose. His language serves not merely to communicate information but also to establish arguments, distinguish between competing positions, persuade the reader, and organise complex intellectual questions. The structure and style of such prose are therefore significant from a literary perspective because they show how Arabic rhetorical conventions could operate within scholarly discourse in nineteenth-century India.4
His Arabic prose should also be read as part of the broader development of Arabic intellectual culture in South Asia. Indian scholars frequently used Arabic to preserve, interpret, defend, and develop Islamic intellectual traditions. Khairabadi participated in this process through his writings on theology, philosophy, religious thought, and related subjects. His contribution consequently extends beyond literary aesthetics and enters the field of intellectual history. The literary quality of his prose is inseparable from the clarity of his argument, the force of his language, and his ability to employ established Arabic rhetorical conventions for the purposes of scholarly debate. His prose also demonstrates how Arabic scholarship in India maintained a connection with the intellectual traditions of the wider Muslim world while remaining embedded in the social and cultural environment of South Asia. In this sense, Khairabadi’s prose represents a form of intellectual continuity: the classical Arabic scholarly tradition remained available as a living intellectual resource through which Indian scholars could address questions meaningful to their own circumstances.
The Arabic Account of the Revolt of 1857: The relationship between Khairabadi’s Arabic literary legacy and his anti-colonial consciousness becomes particularly significant in his writings concerning the events of 1857. His Arabic account, generally known as al-Thawrah al-Hindiyyah, is important not only as historical testimony but also as a literary and autobiographical text.5 Scholarly discussions of the work place it in the context of his imprisonment and exile in the Andaman penal colony. Jamal Malik has examined Khairabadi’s writings, letters, prison sketches, and autobiographical materials as an important body of literature emerging from the colonial penal experience. From this perspective, the significance of Khairabadi’s writings extends beyond the question of whether they provide a complete or objectively neutral history of the uprising. They are valuable because they reveal how a participant and subsequently a colonial prisoner remembered and represented a period of extraordinary political and social upheaval.
The significance of al-Thawrah al-Hindiyyah lies partly in the fact that it provides a retrospective representation of the events of 1857 through the perspective of a participant who subsequently experienced colonial imprisonment and exile. The text therefore occupies a position between history, autobiography, political memory, and literary expression.6 It should not be treated simply as a neutral chronological record. Its narrative voice, selection of events, presentation of personalities, and interpretation of political developments all contribute to the construction of historical memory. The manner in which events are remembered and narrated is itself significant because historical writing is never entirely separated from the perspective of its author. Khairabadi’s account consequently provides an opportunity to examine not only what happened but also how political events were remembered, interpreted, and represented by someone whose personal circumstances were profoundly affected by them. This makes the work particularly valuable for a literary-historical study of Khairabadi.
At the same time, the text requires critical reading. Modern scholarship has pointed out that Khairabadi’s own retrospective account does not always correspond neatly with later nationalist narratives concerning his role in 1857. One scholarly discussion, for example, notes the tension between later representations of his involvement in the jihad-related fatwa and the account presented in Al-Thawrah al-Hindiyyah.7 Such differences demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between Khairabadi’s own testimony, colonial records, later nationalist interpretations, and subsequent biographical traditions. Rather than selecting one version as automatically authoritative, a literary-historical study should recognise the differences among these sources and consider the reasons for such differences. This approach enables Khairabadi’s historical writing to be examined as a text shaped by memory, experience, political circumstances, and literary representation.
Anti-Colonial Resistance and Intellectual Thought: Khairabadi’s relationship with the anti-colonial resistance of 1857 constitutes another major dimension of his historical significance. Iqbal Husain’s study presents him as a major scholarly figure associated with the events of 1857, while Jamal Malik places particular emphasis on his status as a political prisoner and on the importance of his writings from the Andaman penal colony. These studies help to move the discussion beyond a purely biographical understanding of Khairabadi and encourage attention to the relationship between intellectual identity, political circumstances, and colonial repression. His historical significance is therefore connected not simply with his presence during the uprising but also with the ways in which his intellectual position and subsequent experiences were reflected in his writings.8
It is important, however, to approach the question of the so-called fatwa-e-jihad with historical caution.9 Later accounts frequently present Khairabadi as the principal religious authority behind a declaration of armed resistance against British rule, but the documentary history is more complex. His own writings, colonial judicial records, and later historical narratives do not always present the same picture. Consequently, rather than reducing his anti-colonial role to a single religious decree, it is more productive to examine his wider intellectual position, his relationship with the political environment of Delhi in 1857, his subsequent prosecution, and the writings produced during his imprisonment. Such an approach avoids turning a complex historical question into a simplified biographical claim. It also enables the researcher to distinguish between contemporary evidence and later interpretations of his political role. His resistance can consequently be understood as part of a wider intellectual and historical response to colonial domination rather than merely as the consequence of one isolated act.
His subsequent imprisonment and transportation to the Andaman Islands added another dimension to his intellectual legacy. Exile transformed personal suffering into a subject of literary and historical memory. His prison writings and retrospective accounts reveal the interaction between individual experience and collective historical trauma. In this sense, his literary production may be read as a form of cultural remembrance through which the experience of colonial repression was recorded, interpreted, and transmitted. The importance of exile in this context is not merely biographical. It provides a framework through which questions of identity, homeland, separation, memory, religious conviction, and political suffering can be examined together. His experience demonstrates how historical circumstances can influence literary expression and how personal suffering may become part of a larger cultural memory.10
Arabic Poetry: Suffering and Resistance: Poetry occupies an important place in understanding Khairabadi’s literary personality. His Arabic poems demonstrate his engagement with classical Arabic poetic conventions while also providing a space for personal reflection and historical experience. The poetry associated with his period of imprisonment is particularly significant because it connects literary expression with exile, separation, suffering, memory, religious conviction, and the experience of colonial confinement.11 Poetry thus provides a different mode of expression from theological or philosophical prose. Whereas prose permits sustained intellectual argument, poetry allows experience to be compressed into imagery, emotion, rhythm, rhetorical intensity, and memorable expression.
From a literary perspective, these poems deserve examination not simply for their historical content but also for their artistic construction. The use of rhetorical contrast, repetition, metaphor, emotional appeal, and classical poetic diction can be examined as part of Khairabadi’s literary technique.12 His poetry shows how classical Arabic forms could be adapted to express experiences arising from the Indian colonial context. The tension between homeland and exile, freedom and imprisonment, hope and suffering, and personal loss and collective memory provides a significant thematic framework for literary analysis. Such contrasts are particularly important because they allow the emotional experience of imprisonment to be transformed into literary form. Rather than functioning only as a record of suffering, poetry becomes a means of interpreting suffering and giving it moral, religious, and historical significance.
The poetic dimension of Khairabadi’s work also demonstrates that resistance literature need not always take the form of direct political proclamation.13 Resistance can be expressed through remembrance, lamentation, moral reflection, religious conviction, and the preservation of historical experience. His Arabic poetry may therefore be approached as a form of literary testimony in which the personal and the political intersect. The significance of such poetry lies precisely in its ability to connect private emotion with wider historical circumstances. Exile, separation, and confinement are personal experiences, yet in the context of colonial rule they also acquire political meaning. Khairabadi’s poetry therefore provides a valuable example of how literary expression can transform individual experience into a broader reflection on historical suffering and resistance.
Khairabadi’s Arabic Literary Style: A critical reading of Khairabadi’s Arabic writings reveals several features that deserve attention. First, his language is strongly connected with the classical Arabic scholarly tradition. His prose reflects an awareness of established forms of argumentation and rhetorical presentation, while his poetry draws upon classical conventions of diction, rhythm, imagery, and poetic expression. Secondly, his writings demonstrate the close relationship between intellectual content and literary form. His use of Arabic is not merely functional; language itself becomes an instrument for persuasion, reflection, emotional expression, and historical representation. This relationship between content and form is especially important in evaluating his literary contribution because it demonstrates that his Arabic writing cannot be separated from the intellectual purposes for which it was produced.14
Another important feature is the interaction between inherited literary forms and contemporary experience. Khairabadi did not write in an intellectual vacuum. His Arabic expression was shaped by the political and cultural circumstances of nineteenth-century India. Consequently, his writings can be studied as examples of how Arabic literary culture in India responded to changing historical realities. The classical tradition provided him with a sophisticated literary and intellectual vocabulary, while the Indian colonial environment supplied new experiences and subjects for expression. This interaction between inherited form and contemporary experience is one of the most significant aspects of his literary identity. It demonstrates that classical Arabic literature could remain culturally productive outside the Arab world and could provide Indian scholars with a language through which local and historical experiences were articulated.
His writings may also be examined through the relationship between reason and emotion. His theological and philosophical works are characterised by intellectual argument, whereas his poetry and autobiographical writings provide greater space for personal feeling and historical memory. These two dimensions should not, however, be regarded as completely separate. Both depend upon his command of Arabic language and rhetoric, and both reveal different aspects of the same intellectual personality. Together, they create a multifaceted literary identity in which the scholar, thinker, poet, and historical witness are closely connected. This combination also makes Khairabadi particularly relevant to interdisciplinary literary research, since his writings allow literary form, intellectual history, political experience, and cultural memory to be considered within a single framework.
Khairabadi’s Place in Indian Arabic Literature: Khairabadi’s contribution should ultimately be situated within the wider history of Arabic literature in India. Indian Arabic literature developed through the sustained efforts of scholars who used Arabic as a language of religious scholarship, philosophy, history, biography, poetry, and intellectual communication. Khairabadi represents an important stage in this tradition because his writings demonstrate how Arabic could remain connected with classical literary and scholarly conventions while responding to the historical realities of nineteenth-century India. His work illustrates the continuing ability of Indian scholars to participate in Arabic intellectual culture while remaining deeply connected with their own social and historical environment.15
His importance is particularly evident in the relationship between Arabic literary culture and historical consciousness. His writings demonstrate that Indian Arabic literature was not isolated from the political and social transformations of its time. Rather, literary and intellectual production could become a means of recording historical experience, expressing moral judgement, preserving cultural memory, and articulating resistance to political domination. This broader perspective is important because it prevents Indian Arabic literature from being viewed merely as an extension of classical Arabic literature without an independent historical context. Khairabadi’s writings suggest that the Indian environment could generate new subjects, experiences, and emotional concerns while the classical Arabic tradition continued to provide the linguistic and literary framework for expressing them.
For this reason, Khairabadi should not be viewed exclusively as a theologian associated with the controversy surrounding 1857. His Arabic writings provide evidence of a broader intellectual and literary personality. His work connects theology with literature, philosophy with rhetoric, historical experience with autobiography, and personal suffering with collective memory. This interdisciplinary character makes his contribution particularly valuable for the study of Arabic literature in India. It also demonstrates why his literary legacy deserves to be studied independently rather than being treated merely as an extension of his political biography. His importance lies in the interaction among these different dimensions and in the way they collectively illuminate the cultural history of Arabic in nineteenth-century India.
Critical Assessment: A balanced assessment of Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi requires attention to both his literary achievement and the historical debates surrounding his political role. His significance does not depend solely on whether every later claim concerning his participation in 1857 can be accepted without qualification. Indeed, the differences between his own retrospective account and later historical narratives make his writings even more valuable for critical study. They invite the researcher to examine how historical memory is produced through texts and how political identity is constructed through later interpretations. Such a critical perspective also prevents the study from becoming either purely celebratory or exclusively political. His contribution should instead be evaluated through the interaction of textual evidence, literary form, historical context, and later reception.16
From a literary perspective, his legacy is significant because his Arabic writings demonstrate the continued vitality of Arabic intellectual and literary culture in nineteenth-century India. His prose reflects the argumentative traditions of classical scholarship, while his poetry reveals the possibilities of Arabic literary expression in articulating personal and historical experience. His writings from the period of imprisonment further demonstrate how exile and suffering could become subjects of literary representation. The significance of his work therefore lies not only in the historical information it contains but also in the ways in which language, memory, rhetoric, and literary form shape the representation of experience. His texts provide an opportunity to examine how an Indian scholar employed Arabic to negotiate the relationship between inherited intellectual traditions and rapidly changing political realities.
Thus, Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi occupies a distinctive position at the intersection of Arabic literature, Islamic scholarship, Indian intellectual history, and anti-colonial resistance. His literary legacy should neither be reduced to political biography nor separated completely from the historical circumstances in which his writings were produced. Rather, his works should be read as part of a complex literary and intellectual response to the changing realities of nineteenth-century India. Such an approach allows his contribution to be appreciated without overlooking the historical debates surrounding his political role. It also strengthens the argument that the study of Indian Arabic literature requires attention not only to linguistic and aesthetic questions but also to the historical experiences that shaped literary production.
Conclusion
Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi’s contribution to Arabic literary culture represents an important but comparatively underexplored dimension of nineteenth-century Indian intellectual history. His command of Arabic scholarly and literary traditions, his theological and philosophical writings, his poetry, and his account of the events of 1857 together reveal a multifaceted literary personality. His writings demonstrate how Arabic continued to function in India as a living language of intellectual debate, literary creativity, historical reflection, and cultural memory. They also demonstrate the capacity of Indian scholars to engage with the classical Arabic tradition while using it to articulate concerns arising from their own social and historical environment. At the same time, his experience of colonial repression, imprisonment, and exile gave a distinctive historical dimension to his literary expression. His writings allow the relationship between literature and anti-colonial consciousness to be examined through a combination of textual, historical, and intellectual perspectives. His account of 1857 provides an important example of the intersection between historical testimony and literary memory, while his poetry offers a space in which suffering, exile, religious conviction, and remembrance acquire literary form. His theological and philosophical prose, meanwhile, demonstrates the continued importance of Arabic as a language of intellectual argument and scholarly communication in nineteenth-century India.
A critical study of Khairabadi therefore contributes not only to the understanding of an individual scholar and poet but also to a broader appreciation of the development of Arabic literature in India. His legacy ultimately demonstrates how classical Arabic literary resources could be employed by an Indian scholar to express the intellectual, moral, emotional, and historical experiences of his own age. His place in Indian Arabic literary history is consequently best understood through the interaction of scholarship, literature, historical memory, and anti-colonial consciousness. Such an integrated reading provides a more comprehensive assessment of Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi and highlights the wider significance of Arabic literary culture in nineteenth-century India.
Bibliography
1. Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature: The Case of Fadl-e Haqq Khairabadi in the Andaman Penal Colony,” The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 43, no. 1, 2006, pp. 77–100.
2. Khairabadi, Fazl-e-Haq , Taḥqīq al-Fatwā fī Ibṭāl al-Taghwā, 3rd ed. Lahore: Maktabah Qadiriyyah, 2000. pp. 67-71.
3. Khairabadi, Fazl-e-Haq , Dīwān Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi: Dirāsah wa-Taḥqīq, ed. Salma Fibrous Sayhul, Lahore: Maktabah Dār al-Islām, 2016, pp. 77.
4. Iqbal Husain, “Fazle Haq of Khairabad—A Scholarly Rebel of 1857,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 48, 1987, pp. 355–365.
5. Muhammad ʿAbd al-Shahid Khan Sherwani, trans. and ed., Al-Thaurat al-Hindiyya; Baghi Hindustan, 4th ed. (Mubarikpur, 1985), pp. 26–85; see also Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature,” pp. 77–100.
6. Muhammad ʿAbd al-Shahid Khan Sherwani, trans. and ed., Al-Thaurat al-Hindiyya; Baghi Hindustan, 4th ed. (Mubarikpur, 1985), pp. 26–85.
7. Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature: The Case of Fadl-e Haqq Khairabadi in the Andaman Penal Colony,” The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 43, no. 1, 2006, pp. 77–100.
8. Iqbal Husain, “Fazle Haq of Khairabad—A Scholarly Rebel of 1857,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 48, 1987, pp. 355–365; Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature,” pp. 77–100.
9. Imtiyaz Ali Khan Arshi, “Kya Maulana Fadl-e Haqq Khairabadi ka 1857 ke Fatwa-e-Jihad se Ta'alluq Tha?,” Tahrik, 1957; reprinted in Naya Daur (Lucknow), Feb. 1981, pp. 4–12; see also Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature,” pp. 77–100.
10. Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature,” p. 85; Clare Anderson, The Indian Uprising of 1857–58: Prisons, Prisoners and Rebellion (London: Anthem Press, 2007), pp. 17–18.
11. Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi, Arabic poems reproduced in Muhammad ʿAbd al-Shahid Khan Sherwani, trans. and ed., Al-Thaurat al-Hindiyya; Baghi Hindustan, 4th ed. (Mubarikpur, 1985), pp. 86–105, 106–119; see also Dīwān Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi: Dirāsah wa-Taḥqīq, ed. Salma Firdous Sayhul (Lahore: Maktabah Dār al-Islām, 2016).
12. Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi, Dīwān Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi: Dirāsah wa-Taḥqīq, ed. Salma Firdous Sayhul (Lahore: Maktabah Dār al-Islām, 2016), p. 77.
13. Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature: The Case of Fadl-e Haqq Khairabadi in the Andaman Penal Colony,” The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 43, no. 1, 2006, pp. 77–100.
14. Iqbal Husain, “Fazle Haq of Khairabad—A Scholarly Rebel of 1857,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 48, 1987, pp. 355–365.
15. Iqbal Husain, “Fazle Haq of Khairabad—A Scholarly Rebel of 1857,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 48, 1987, pp. 355–365; Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature,” pp. 77–100.
16. Jamal Malik, “Letters, Prison Sketches and Autobiographical Literature: The Case of Fadl-e Haqq Khairabadi in the Andaman Penal Colony,” The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 43, no. 1, 2006, p. 85.
References
ʿAlī, Rahman. Tadhkirah-ye ʿUlamāʾ-ye Hind. Lucknow, 1914.
ʿAqīl, Muʿīn al-Dīn. “Maulana Fadl-e Haqq: Aik Kitabiyati Ja'izah.” ʿAllāmah Fażl-e Ḥaqq Khairābādī aur Jihād-e Āzādī, edited by Muhammad Saʿīd al-Raḥmān ʿAlawī, Lahore, 1987.
Alam, Muzaffar. “Religion and Politics in Awadh Society: 17th and 18th Centuries.” Islam and Indian Regions, edited by A. L. Dallapiccola and S. Zingel-Avé Lallemant, vol. 1, Stuttgart, 1993, pp. 321–350.
Alam, Muzaffar. The Languages of Political Islam in India. Permanent Black, 2004.
Hartung, Jan-Peter. “Rationality in Decline? Fazl-i Haqq Khayrābādī and the Mutiny.” Muslim and Dalit Narratives of 1857, pp. 140–145.
Haq, Moinul, translator. “The Story of the War of Independence, 1857–58, by Allamah Fadl-i Haqq of Khayrabad.” Journal of the Pakistan Historical Society, vol. 5, no. 1, 1957, pp. 23–57.
Sayhūl, Salmā. ʿAllāma Fażl-i Ḥaqq Khayrābādī. Lahore, 2001.
Khan, Imtiyaz Ali. “Kya Maulana Fadl-e Haqq Khairabadi ka 1857 ke Fatwa-e-Jihad se Ta'alluq Tha?” Tahrik, 1957. Reprinted in Naya Daur, Feb. 1981, pp. 4–12.
Sherwani, Muhammad ʿAbd al-Shahid Khan, translator and editor. Al-Thaurat al-Hindiyya; Baghi Hindustan. 4th ed., Mubarikpur, 1985.
Sayhul, Salma Firdous, editor. Dīwān Fazl-e Haqq Khairabadi: Dirāsah wa-Taḥqīq. Maktabah Dār al-Islām, 2016.
